Skip to content

Is Digital Ed Good? Sir, It Is Pie.

AS A SUPPORTER OF MASS EDUCATION, I should be cheering digital education wholeheartedly. And, certainly, it has its advantages. But the current surge of start-ups appears to me, at its best, an attempt by an energetic group of highly educated technophiles to put their favorite hobby on their resumes, and, at its worst, a sort of Trojan Horse for corporate interests to infiltrate the once impregnable Kingdom of Academia.

Is there anyone who really thinks that, if these projects gain a serious foothold in education, they’re going to stay cheap and accessible? Educator Aron Solomon doesn’t, anyway, according to his blog post, Free Vultures:

So what do you think we should make of well-funded EDU startups, offering free education? I don’t need to call any of them out – you can do your homework and guess to whom I’m referring. But the idea that some famous educators are going to get together, offer life-changing courses for free, are doing so with millions of dollars of venture (that’s the key word) capital, and expect nothing in return is, in the words of Styx, The Grand Illusion.

Wake up. There is coffee to be smelled.

What makes the whole movement a bit creepy is the messianic fervor that has taken hold of its advocates. It’s not merely sensible innovation; it’s nothing less than education for the whole planet. The Faculty Project claims that it “brings academia’s most outstanding professors to the computers, tablets and smartphones of people all over the world.” The University of the People, founded by testing entrepreneur Shai Reshef, bills itself as “the world’s tuition-free, non-profit, online academic institution dedicated to opening access to higher education globally.”

In an article about UoP for the Chronicle of Higher Education, titled, A College Education for All, Free and Online, Education Sector’s Kevin Carey writes, “For most of humanity, this is the only viable way to get access to higher education.” In a similar post, MIT Mints a Valuable New Form of Academic Currency, he writes, “But it is simply untenable to claim global leadership in educating a planet of seven billion people when you hoard your educational offerings for a few thousand fortunates living together on a small patch of land.”

Come, then: is it more tenable to claim the same thing when you “hoard your educational offerings” for an equally small percentage of fortunates living together in cyberspace?

The notion of “humanity” having tablets and smart phones seems, well, a bit droll, if not downright corrupt. There’s long been an imperialist taint to the word and its various cousins, whenever they’re used in this way. Joseph Conrad smelled it. So did Mark Twain, in his anti-colonial essay, To the Person Sitting in Darkness:

The Blessings of Civilization are all right, and a good commercial property; there could not be a better, in a dim light. In the right kind of a light, and at a proper distance, with the goods a little out of focus, they furnish this desirable exhibit to the Gentlemen who Sit in Darkness:

LOVE LAW AND ORDER
JUSTICE LIBERTY
GENTLENESS EQUALITY
CHRISTIANITY HONORABLE DEALING
PROTECTION TO THE WEAK MERCY
TEMPERANCE EDUCATION

—and so on.

There. Is it good? Sir, it is pie.

Laying claim to global values is the same rhetorical tactic that makes ideological think tanks self-identify as “non partisan.” Or, for that matter, the University of the People to market its courses as “culturally neutral,” while all potential students must know English, and the only two programs of study are Business Administration and Computer Science.

“Humanity” does not own a computer. Babies, as far as I know, are not issued tablets at birth. Ownership of pricey hardware and facility in using it remain the province of the same high-performing students who have long attended the elite universities of the world. The insistence of digital education entrepreneurs—and their champions—to call this tiny segment of the population “humanity” reflects either a genuine misunderstanding of what the word means, or, what’s more likely, an instinctive understanding of how best to display their educational products in the best light.

John Gast, "American Progress" (1872)

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Jumping a Better Shark?

The last time I went to Target, one of the items on my list was a package of hair bands. There was a pretty large selection, but I picked something called “Ouchless Elastics–Little Black Dress,” from Goody® Products. Here’s what’s on the package, in tiny, ungrammatical sans-serif:

YOUR FAVORITE ELASTIC IS NOW EVEN BETTER!

Only Goody Ouchless elastics are made with SmartStretch Core, helping each one hold its shape longer without stretching out. All the while giving you the same gentle and comfortable hold that makes them America’s #1.

A few questions come to mind. First, who makes America’s #2 elastic? Second, can one really get a trademark these days by splicing together a couple of common nouns? Third, how is Goody’s compulsion to improve elastic bands different from Mozilla Open Badges, MIT OpenCourseWare, Udacity, Udemy, Khan Academy, UniversityNow, Knewton, Coursebook, Coursekit, Courseload, CourseRank, OneSchool, & etc?

Endless innovation, as part of the discourse of business, has hit education, hard. And when I say “endless,” I mean it. The marketing strategy is to create a better product. At the end of the day, though, the point is to sell more—more of whatever it is: a college class or an elastic band. As one popular business book said a few decades ago, “If it ain’t broke…break it!”

Yes, we need to change, to try new things. I change my classes every semester. (In fact, now that Spring Break is over, I’ve had time to rethink how I’m going to change things beginning tomorrow, based on my own experiences in the classroom. Is that innovative enough?) And these innovations must involve digital resources and online classes. The question is, though, now that business has finally conquered academia, is better learning really the goal? Or is it only to trademark more and more spliced nouns?

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

John Ruskin Occupies Wall Street

The best things in life are free. At least they are at iBooks, anyway. So far, I’ve been reading, gratis, books by Dickens, Wilde, Emerson, Cicero, Schopenhauer, James (W.), James (H.), Hawthorne, Douglass, Petrarch, Wells, and the spectacular—really!—Henry Rider Haggard.

The one I’m having the most fun with at the moment is Time and tide by Weare and Tyne: twenty-five letters to a working man of Sunderland on the law of work, by John Ruskin. According to the Preface, the letters “were written to Mr. Thomas Dixon, a working cork-cutter of Sunderland, during the agitation for Reform in the spring of the present year. They contain, in the plainest terms I could use, the substance of what I then desired to say to our English workmen…”

Dixon’s letters are not included, which is a shame, as they would probably have proved a robust, red-blooded counterpoise to both Ruskin’s language and his condescending tone, e.g.:

…in spite of all the cant which is continually talked by cruel, foolish, or designing persons about “the duty of remaining content in the position in which Providence has placed you,” there is a root of the very deepest and holiest truth in the saying, which gives to it such power as it still retains, even uttered by unkind and unwise lips, and received into doubtful and embittered hearts.

Why is it that those people who preach the holiness and dignity of low-wage labor are the least likely to have to actually do any?

Some of Ruskin’s letters read like Ralph Waldo Emerson mixed with John Harvey’s Brief History of Neoliberalism. (Ruskin actually refers to Emerson in Time and tide.) Furthermore, the letters in which he applies the ideas of Self Reliance to issues of wage and class have a surprisingly modern ring. Take this passage, from Letter XII, dated March 20, 1867 (emphasis added):

the labor undertaken by by the several members of a political community is necessarily, and justly, within certain limits, independent; and obtains for them independent advantage, of which…you will see I should be the last person to propose depriving them. This great difference in final condition involves necessarily much complexity in the system and application of general laws; but it in no wise abrogates,—on the contrary, it renders yet more imperative,—the necessity for the firm ordinance of such laws, which, marking the due limits of independent agency, may enable it to exist in full energy, not only without becoming injurious, but so as more variously and perfectly to promote the entire interests of the commonwealth.

And this one, from Letter XV, dated 29th March of the same year:

Such fortunes as are now the prizes of commerce can be made only in one of three ways:—

(1.) By obtaining command over the labor of multitudes of other men and taxing it for our own profit.

(2.) By treasure-trove,—as of mines, useful vegetable products, and the like,—in circumstances putting them under own exclusive control.

(3.) By speculation, (commercial gambling).

The first two of the means of obtaining riches are, in some forms and within certain limits, lawful, and advantageous to the State. The third is entirely detrimental to it; for in all cases of profit derived from speculation, at best, what one man gains another loses; and the net results to State is zero, (pecuniarily), with the loss of the time and ingenuity spent in the transaction; besides the disadvantage involved in discouragement of the losing party, and the corrupted moral natures of both. This is the result of speculation at its best. At its worst, not only B loses what A gains (having taken his fair risk of such loss for his fair chance of gain), but C and D, who never had any chance at all, are drawn in by B’s fall, and the final result is that A sets up his carriage on the collected sum which was once the means of living to a dozen families.

All of which makes C and D fair examples of today’s (ex)homeowners. Finally:

Nor is this all. For while real commerce is founded on real necessity or uses, and limited by these, speculation, of which the object is merely gain, seeks to excite imaginary necessities and popular desires, in order to gather its temporary profit from the supply of them. So that not only the persons who lend their money to it will be finally robbed, but the work done with their money will be, for the most part, useless, and thus the entire body of the public injured as well as the persons concerned in the transaction.

The really surprising—and slightly worrying—aspect of all this is not that the arguments of a 19th Century art critic might apply to the big Wall Street banks, but that modern-day America now looks an awfully lot like Victorian England. Can we get a mic check on that?

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Tuition Follies at For-Profit U.

Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) recently decided to retire, citing the increasingly divisive nature of Republican rhetoric as reason for getting out of the game. The Sunlight Foundation Reporting Group, however, thinks otherwise, and wonders if it’s related to the legal troubles surrounding the for-profit education company, Education Management Corp., which lists Snowe’s husband, John McKernan, Jr., as Chairman of the Board.

The legal trouble in question has to do with alleged cash incentives that EMC offered it’s recruiting agents. I can’t comment on how EDMC reimburses its agents but, having briefly taught at a for-profit college in the city, I have my own thoughts on the matter. On a hunch, I went to EDMC’s web site (guaranteeing, I’m sure, that I’ll be targeted with for-profit college ads for the rest of my web-browsing days) to see how they responded to the controversy. In a press release, Bonnie Campbell, EDMC’s legal counsel, had this to say:

EDMC schools are accredited institutions offering a pathway to a career to many who would not be served by traditional higher education.

Yep. This is boilerplate stuff for private education companies, who all seem to play the Albert Schweitzer card whenever it comes to defending their practices.

But what “pathway” does Education Management Corp. offer to underserved students? One of their brands, South University, offers a number of degrees in the Nursing and Health Professions, which is an excellent choice for students looking for actual work. Among these is a 24 month Medical Assisting Program leading to an associate’s degree.  The tuition?

$41,960

And that’s not including something called Books & Digital Resources, which SU estimates at about $3200 over two years. This seems to be about the same for most of SU’s associate degree programs, with the exception being the Associate of Science in Physical Therapy Assisting, which is $47,205. Bachelor of Science degrees, on the other hand, weigh in at $78,675.

By comparison, the community college where I teach offers similar programs at $1,700 per semester for New York residents. At SUNY Geneseo, tuition is $5,270 per year. Jumping up the ladder, some of the programs at Cornell University charge tuition of $27,045 per year. At the School of General Studies at Columbia, it’s $23,664/yr. And, what the heck, let’s go straight to Harvard, where it’s $33,696. Granted, that comes out to be a bit more than SU, but it’s…you know…Harvard.

Who, exactly, is being “served” here? All other questions of recruiting agents and Gainful Employment rules aside, charging disadvantaged students $47,000 for a two year degree verges on the criminal.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The Joy of Research: War on Christmas Edition

I was just helping a student do some research for a history essay. The mission: find 3 primary documents from the 19th Century that reveal something about the spirit of the age. Her topic: Christmas shopping.

We did a database search of all the articles from the New York Times published before the year 1880, using the terms “Christmas” and “Shopping,” and got a measly 40 hits on 2 pages, a good number of them tiny classified ads. The first article, written in 1870, was titled, The Enemy of the Family, and was a complaint about “middle men” running up the prices of goods at Christmas time. Other titles included:

PERU.: How Christmas was celebrated in Lima—Peruvian Ladies—Their Lack of Refinement—Political Matters.

COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS.: Sales at the Stock Exchange Dec. 16.

THE SPECTRE SHIP

And, lumbering in at #24:

CURRENT ENGLISH TOPICS: POLITICAL AND GENERAL NOTES. THE MAN WHO KNOWS EVERYTHING THE EASTERN QUESTION BRAGGING JOHN BULL COCKNEYISM IN LONDON TWO PUGILISTIC WAR CORRESPONDENTS THE PRIVILEGES OF PROTECTION AND THE IRON TRADE.

This last one very nearly crushed her spirit. We were stymied.

Then I remembered that I’d recently read Land of Desire: Merchants, Power, and the Rise of a New American Culture, by the historian William R. Leach. According to Leach:

Before 1880 business like department stores did not exist…In the next twenty years, however, cities throughout the country would be filled with large retail establishmentsmultifloored, multiwindowed buildings of great concentrated selling power.

These huge department stores were the result of a deliberate, concentrated culture of shopping,

unconnected to traditional family or community values, to religion in any conventional sense, or to political democracy. It was a secular business and market-oriented culture, with the exchange and circulation of money and goods at the foundation of its aesthetic life and its moral sensibility.

In the case of Christmas,

when the large department stores first began to overshadow retail districts, Santa Claus’s status also started to metamorphose. The big merchants laid claim to him and to the imagery of the Christmas holidays. Urban merchandising began to give substance and form to the Christmas rituals.

So, on a hunch, I suggested to the student that we change the search criteria to articles published between 1880 and 1900. A few clicks of the mouse later, and we had 406 citations. The title of the 1st article was:

MUCH CHRISTMAS SHOPPING: The Season of 1898 Has Been the Best in Many Years. THE FINAL RUSH LAST NIGHT Belated Buyers Crowded the Stores—A Great Year for Mistletoe and Other Greens.

Some others were:

CHRISTMAS STREET SCENES.: JOSTLING CROWDS OF SHOPPERS IN THE RETAIL STORE DISTRICTS. (1888)

FOR THE COMING HOLIDAY: Suggestions to the Christmas Shopper and Home Worker. THE SEASON’S RARELY LAVISH DISPLAY What a Round of the Shops Offers — Prices and Quality Most Satisfactory — Designs for Home Work. (1895)

STORE THIEVES AND DETECTIVE: Both Have Already Appeared in the Mass of Holiday Shoppers That Crowd the Big Shops. (1899)

And, of course:

Killed After Christmas Shopping Trip. (1900)

There were 20 more pages of this stuff. Thank you, Santa! The student left happy, if a little over-burdened, and now I’m looking forward to reading a fine essay.

And to Bill O’Reilly and all the other commentators who complain yearly about the government and the forces of political correctness storming the Christmas gates, I offer this line from The Odyssey:

But come now, change thy theme, and sing of the building of the horse of wood, which Epeius made with Athena’s help, the horse which once Odysseus led up into the citadel as a thing of guile, when he had filled it with the men who sacked Ilion.

Christmas lost the war a long time ago, taken from within before it even knew it was vulnerable.

***

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Are you there, Harvard? It’s me, Professor X

Professor X made his debut in an article for The Atlantic, where he attempted to paint himself as a Shakespearean hero, all the while parading his students across the public stage in a kind of Open Enrollment Freak Show. Now he can be found peering through the curtain over at Inside Higher Ed, where he is promoting his new book, In the Basement of the Ivory Tower: Confessions of an Accidental Academic. “The contents of my book,” he says, “will come as no surprise to many college instructors.”

Now, while I resent the presumption of camaraderie, I have to admit that the issues he brings up are real and serious, and they require real, serious solutions. In fact, my department has been struggling with them—theoretically and practically—all year. They also show up in a lot of office banter, especially at the end of the semester, when grades are due and writing portfolios are piling up. But nobody I share office space with would ever bring such frustrations out into the hallway, much less try to sell them to the highest bidder. And, no, it has nothing to do with hypocrisy, or job protection. It’s a matter of integrity, and respect for students and colleagues.

It also comes as no surprise to read yet another tract by “Anonymous,” the nom de plume du jour of those with an eye toward self-promotion. The conceit in Prof. X’s case is that he’s worried about reprisals. Given the absolute necessity of adjuncts to the modern college system, though, he could probably go on sacrificing students at the altar of his narcissism indefinitely and still be able to pick up another section of EN101.

Prof. X calls himself a “fairly skilled writer,” and he certainly seems competent enough. But no matter—Viking isn’t paying him for his talents, anyway. My guess is that his original article generated enough controversy to show up on the internet radar screen, and an editor who was scanning “the cloud” merely spotted a moderately profitable blip, and initiated contact. And, I assume, the book will even let its author buy a new Guy Fawkes mask, once he takes his circus on the road. After all, Snooki just got $32K for appearing at Rutgers, so there’s no telling what Prof. X could get at the next meeting of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, or by delivering some opening remarks at the premiere of Atlas Shrugged.

For this may prove to be his ironic fate. No longer content to merely savage his students, who can’t defend themselves, Prof. X has pushed it up a notch by maligning teachers, as well, and the tempest of criticism that the book will receive is likely to blow him, indignant and martyred, straight into the arms of public education’s worst enemies. And they’ll embrace him. A Professor he may be, and probably a Union member, to boot, but über-politics makes for strange bedfellows. As Prof. X says,

I have had no choice but to recognize that many of my students have no business being in college…Putting an end to their participation without sentencing them to a life in the aisles of Wal-Mart would require that Americans relinquish their ill-thought-out love affair with higher education. Which would require an abandonment of the cockeyed optimism that has taken over our educational discourse. Which would require an embracing, again, of simple job training….Which would require the colleges, particularly the lower-tier and community colleges, to rethink who they are enrolling, who they are serving, what the purpose of the whole rigmarole is.

Which would bring me to the final reason that Prof. X’s arguments ring such a familiar bell: they’re a couple of centuries old. For example, Lida Rose McCabe, in her 1893 book, The American Girl at College, wrote, “It is the woman with the best general education who understands most thoroughly her domestic duties.” And an 1875 article in the New York Times had this to say about a new type of college just then appearing in the U.S.:

The curriculum of studies should not be ambitious. Too much is probably attempted in most of the freedmen’s colleges. What is wanted is a plain, thorough course of English studies, with but little of the higher mathematics or metaphysics…They will be instructed to aim, first of all, at self-control and self-culture in themselves and their colored countrymen…They will gain in these colleges, a dim idea of the vast ocean of knowledge around them, and how little they have seen of it, and how many years or generations of patient labor it will require before they reach anything like the stage of mental progress of the white races…Great attention should be given to teaching agriculture and horticulture.

Hey, at least it isn’t Wal-mart. And then those “unfit” for college will no longer pester we few, we happy few, and by “putting an end to their participation” in education, we can finally help them see the folly of their ways, while they go about the business of making curly fries, or harvesting crops, or something else worthy of their station.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Maximum Security English: Opening Night

The Educational Program Director of the prison phoned me on Wednesday morning—the first day of class—to say that she was at a training session somewhere else, and was unable to “get back in,” but good luck, and tell the officer that the textbooks are locked up in a cabinet near Room 14, but that my class is to be put next door, in Room 12.

Not a problem. I’ve taught for many years, under many different circumstances, and I don’t do well in “traditional” environments, anyway. Plus, my colleague and I had been given an orientation the week before. I knew what the place looked like, and how to physically get from the entrance to the “Academic School” building. I’d also met the students (a little more personally than expected, since we’d been asked to give a completely off-the-cuff presentation that had to go for an hour, as they were not being returned to their cells until almost 9:00, and we couldn’t just, you know, dismiss them). So, as Dickens said of Ebenezer Scrooge,

I don’t mind calling on you to believe that he was ready for a good broad field of strange appearances, and that nothing between a baby and rhinoceros would have astonished him very much.

I also knew, however, that I was running smack up against The System. It had been impressed on both of us during orientation that The System is the ultimate power. We had been escorted by the Director of Volunteer Services and the Director of the School Programs, both of whom had that kind of rapport with The System that comes from years of exposure, but it was obvious that every officer in the place was, if not ‘He Who Must Not Be Named,’ at least ‘He Who Must Not Be Contradicted.’ And, even though each employee we met was no more unreasonable or surly than most people are at work, and many were quite friendly, it was implicitly yet forcefully made clear who was in charge.

So, before getting into my car for the snowy drive south, I knew that:

  1. The System is scary and inscrutable, so…
  2. there was no guarantee I’d be able to bring in any of my materials, and besides…
  3. I was going in without my colleague, since his class is on Thursdays, but that was OK because there would be someone else there to help me, plus…
  4. the textbooks were in a locked cabinet, somewhere in the vicinity of the classroom, and the books were crucial, because…
  5. I had to teach for 3 hours with only pen and paper, minus the 20 minutes or so it would take for the students to be “called out” of their cells and get to their desks, and the rather fuzzy amount of time at the and before the bell rang, when the class would end like a blown light bulb while we all immediately rushed out into the hall, but it shouldn’t matter since…
  6. the students themselves are incredibly intelligent, prepared, and motivated, and as hungry as I am for whatever it is that this program will eventually serve up.

What I didn’t know about the place was that, while everything is mandatory, nothing is certain.

*****

I pulled into the parking lot a bit early, after a drive through a wintry landscape of fields, woods, and solitary farmhouse porch lights—Washington Irving meets Stephen King—so I spent a few minutes sitting in my car, within the gaze of the great white wall, drinking cold coffee and clearing my pockets of everything except my driver’s license. Once through the front gate, I was relieved to find that I wasn’t alone: a small group of men who led a Bible study was also going in that night, so I was in good company while navigating security.

All my things went onto the counter—keys, belt, boots, glasses, textbook, notebook, dry erase markers, bottled water. A little bit of joking from the other volunteers, a few terse remarks from the officers (the water was denied), and our little group stepped out into the frozen yard beyond the wall. There were no other people to be seen.

The week before, during orientation, I had been awed by this quiet strip of No Man’s Land, and had caught myself peering, like a junior naturalist, at a dark cluster of employees passing by in the gloom, wondering where all the inmates were. Here there be monsters, but where?

About 30 yards in front of us was the main building. It’s designed, like the rest of the place, in a style that could be called Greek Revival Industrial. I’ve seen it along the waterfronts of cities like Boston, Lowell, and Rochester: piles of red brick, 3 or 4 stories high, with tall, arched windows, severely gabled ends, pilasters and quoins and all the other trappings of a structure designed to warehouse items while giving to the streets a whiff of civic virtue. The whole place looks like a shuttered textile mill, or a college campus during Spring break, except for the rolls of barbed wire on top of everything.

And it is with a shock that I read, just this morning, this passage from Foucault:

Is it surprising that the cellular prison, with its regular chronologies, forced labour, its authorities of surveillance and registration, its experts in normality, who continue and multiply the functions of the judge, should have become the modern instrument of penality? Is it surprising that prisons resemble factories, schools, barracks, hospitals, which all resemble prisons?

A few details that had escaped me during the haze of orientation caught my attention as we entered the main building. First came the smell, a musty, eternal human presence, that reminded me a little bit of a subway station, or the streets of a very old city. This smell, though, was made worse by the meaning of the place, and by the heat coming from an endless line of radiators curled up along the tiled walls, like pythons in a tropical rain forest. It was so hot, in fact, that all of the windows were cracked open to let in occasional draughts of biting air. When we reached ‘Times Square’—the intersection of the four corridors which cut the internal courtyard into quarters—the gate that opened to allow us to pass had a Gothic, serifed look to it, and I realized it was festooned with rows of empty Dixie cups.

The Bible study volunteers eventually veered off toward the chapel, and I was alone with the officer at the entrance to the school area. He didn’t know a thing about the books, or any storage cabinet in Room 14, and as I followed him down the hall he said something about his tax dollars being wasted. There was no real emotion in the statement, and it wasn’t said to my face. It was more of a necessary comment, flattened out after much use into stale outrage mumbled toward the darkness. I wanted to reply that turning down the heat would do more in that regard than offering a couple of community college classes, but, hey, would you have said it?

We looked in some classrooms, and some closets, and found a large storage cabinet off Room 14, but none of the officer’s keys seemed to work on it. He tried several, and then gave up. Before leaving for his station down the hall, he said, “You’ll be in this room.” I sheepishly reminded him that I was supposed to be in Room 12.

“Well,” he said, “we’re putting you in here.”

We? It meant that the discussion was over. He turned and went back to his desk, and I was alone in Room 14 with no textbooks.

*****

Why anyone would put a 1940’s third grade schoolroom in a maximum security prison is beyond me, but that’s exactly what Room 14 looked like. It had a long, low blackboard, several pieces of torpedo-sized blue and pink chalk, an old wooden desk with a swivel chair, and a motivational poster showing children with wings.

Everywhere you look here you can see these odd little touches of humanity. In the Processing Room, for example, where we went to get photographed and fingerprinted, there is a wall hanging in the shape of a lady’s fan, with an illustration that could only have come from one of Norman Rockwell’s Victorian relatives, and while the guard, almost intimately, guided my fingers back and forth between the ink pad and the cards, over and over again, a portable radio played a song by ZZ Top. And in classroom #12, where we had first met the students, 2 of the walls are covered by crude, colorful murals, showing a bucolic scene of a mountain range, a meadow, and a deer leaping a brook, while on a third wall, next to a barred window, there’s a 5 foot trophy portrait of a deer’s head.  (Probably the same deer.)

All of these things live alone, striking in their concentrated individuality, yet absorbed by the general miasma of the prison. They’re like the spirits that Odysseus encountered in the Underworld, or, again, like Scrooge’s small house in A Christmas Carol, lost among the fog and the city, “where it had so little business to be, that one could scarcely help fancying it must have run there when it was a young house, playing at hide and seek with other houses, and have forgotten the way out again.” Who put these things here, and why, and when? No matter. They have become processed. They are Rilke’s dead—outside of all relation, and fluttering in space like an empty sleeve.

I was now in The Red Zone, that concentrated chunk of space and time that precedes any class. In this case, there was about 20 minutes before all the cell blocks got called out. I started moving the desks so that they’d face front without crowding together, a more difficult job than it sounds in a tiny room soon to be occupied by men with mysterious personal space bubbles. Ten minutes went by. I crossed the hall to peer through the window in the library door. It was dark in there, but it looked pretty well stocked, not the motley collection of used paperbacks that I had imagined.

I went back to Room 14, poked around a bit on the shelves, and found a stack of middle school social studies textbooks. I opened one up to a chapter on the influence that natural environments have had on developing societies. It reminded me that, during orientation, one of the students had started talking about Guns, Germs, and Steel, by Jared Diamond, a 450-page book which revolves around a single question Jared once received from a New Guinea politician:

Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?

I set the book aside in case I needed a “teaching moment.”

At 20 minutes past the hour, 5 students came through the door, and a few extended their hands. We had been warned not to shake hands here. Why? Well, my colleague and I have discussed this at some length, and it’s a puzzler. My guess is that, in this place, some gestures of closeness are saved for the vulnerable, and that bleeding hearts can be smelled from a mile away. There are stories of volunteers becoming romantically involved with inmates, carrying things for them, and eventually getting caught “in a closet,” or even trying to smuggle drugs.

Are the stories apocryphal? Probably not. During orientation, one of the students had come right up to ask me if I would write a letter to “somebody” in the DOCS, explaining how important it was for him to stay in the class, and how worried he was about getting transferred to another facility before the semester was over. He felt—and with reason—that this could be his only hope for success after prison. I declined, and told him to direct his request to the Program Director. That refusal flashed in my mind like a talisman as I grasped someone’s hand. Certainly, I’m not going to end up in a closet with anyone, but I don’t have a bleeding heart tattooed on my arm for nothing.

I sat down behind the teacher’s desk and tried to look professorial, mindful of the need to keep up physical and emotional barriers. But the pose felt clichéd, teacherly, authoritative. So I got up and perched on the front of the desk, which put me within arm’s reach of the students. Perfect.

It took almost 45 minutes for all of them to arrive. They ranged in age from “traditional” college upper teens to men as nearly as old as me. Each wore muted green, with a few variations in sweatshirts and other accessories, which they get from family members. Some of them even own typewriters. There is a material hierarchy, even here, and, just like in the Public School System—that other, supposedly equalizing institution—those whose families bring sweatshirts and encouragement may find it a little bit easier to succeed on the outside. And the rest, the ones wearing pure, government-issued green? God only knows.

I had on a blue shirt and matching tie that I wore for the occasion. I was the only White person in the room, which, from what I’ve seen so far, is also true for everybody in the entire facility who isn’t actually incarcerated.

All the students carried notebooks and pens, bought with money earned through various jobs. The books (whenever they get them) will be used until the end of the semester, and then they’ll be given to the library. There were no phones, no laptops, no computer monitors, none of the walls that other college students tend to build around themselves. There was, though, in the absence of CO’s or other handlers—both theirs and mine—a feeling of privacy and freedom that I hadn’t experienced since pulling my car into the shadow of the guard towers earlier that night.

The prison’s list of contraband is long, and includes all the things you’d expect. On my way in, the officer had riffled through my textbook and supplemental articles, and had even stuck his hand into the pockets of my folder, feeling for anything that might make it into the Display of Shanks that graces the wall just inside the main building. What he did not do was ask about the reading material. In fact, nobody but the students has ever expressed an interest in what we’re teaching. Granted, a creative writing instructor there once had a guard take special interest in a story called, “The Art of Aggression,” but that’s about it. It seems that, as long as the touch of a staple generates more concern than a sharply worded essay, the classroom will continue to exist outside the regulating, panoptic gaze of The System. Ideas, apparently, are not contraband, not yet.

I called attendance and handed out the syllabus. It was the same one that I give to all the EN101 classes, minus a lot of my contact information and the part about the use of personal technology, but we discussed it for almost half an hour. It was, after all, the first piece of writing they’d been handed, and interest was intense. When we reached the part about plagiarism, a standard bit of boilerplate that makes even my eyes glaze over, some of the students laughed. One man said,

In here, we call it “biting.”

It never ceases to amaze me what I don’t know. But, let’s face it, it’s a much better word.

I asked the students if they had any questions so far about the course, and they mostly asked about me. Why had I majored in English? Why did I become a professor? Why was I teaching in a prison? (That last one was a better question than they realized, since it’s one I’d been asking myself for weeks.)  I glossed over personal issues, but spent more time explaining how I preferred teaching in various venues, and then talked about why I felt so strongly about the prison education program. When I mentioned the pushback I was getting from some people on the “outside,” it sparked a discussion about the advantages of such programs in terms of money and the social good. Then a student brought up an angle I hadn’t thought of before:

“Aren’t they afraid of someone like me walking the streets, without the chance for a life?”

It wasn’t a threat. He looked stunned, actually, and the class came back to the subject a few times during the evening, trying to understand it. In fact, later, while I was explaining how to document sources, I asked for an example of “common knowledge,” and somebody in the back said,

“We’re in jail!”

It was a funny and awkward moment. They all knew where they were, and why. They knew they had separated themselves from the world. They had signed up for this class because of that awareness, had, in fact, worked harder to get there than almost any community college student in the entire country has ever had to do. And the realization that some people didn’t want them to succeed—despite their best efforts, and despite whatever message they believed they were sending—came as a bit of a shock.

We went over as much ENG101 as I usually cover in a week: rhetoric, traditional essay structure, Writing Across the Curriculum, introductions, body sections, conclusions. In between, we discussed things like the violence in Tucson, the new edition of Huck Finn (and, yes, the n-word), the failures of Reconstruction, and that episode of The Walking Dead where a few hospital janitors use scary, pachuco posturing to protect abandoned patients from the zombies.

The students have access to newspapers and books, and they watch lots of movies and television. Certainly, they have time on their hands, and they aren’t distracted by the Internet, and the movies are probably used to keep them all entertained and out of trouble. But that’s what TV and movies do outside the walls, as well, and we all have access to news material just waiting to be poured over. These students absorbed everything, they remembered it, they connected it. In that regard, they were no different from the adult students I have in my other classes. But, while most returning students are nervous, these were confident, daring, almost ferocious.

Jefferson Cowie of Cornell University has described a similar experience in his article, “On Lecturing in a Prison, Where Minds Are Free”:

They were on fire. They sat attentively without PowerPoint photos to keep them entertained, autumn walks through the gorges to look forward to, or fancy careers to anticipate. They occasionally tossed questions to me during my talk, testing my mettle. Then, when I finished, their hands shot up. For the next hour, I got a vigorous intellectual workout—an exhausting barrage of questions any teacher would relish.

During the discussion, I was corrected 2 times: once when I goofed up on George Bush’s alma mater, and again when I managed to say that Barack Obama was from Kenya.

Right around 8:00, I decided to start going over one of the essays in the text, The Legacy of Generation Ñ, by Christy Haubegger, which first appeared over ten years ago. I didn’t want to read the entire thing myself, so it seemed best to have the students take turns reading paragraphs out loud. I have often used this technique when teaching classes in the city, with great success, and that night was no exception. Not once did I have to call on someone or wait during a painful silence. As the only copy of the book was passed around, each student reached for it like he was suffocating and the thing was a tank of air. They got all the allusions, including a Ricky Martin reference, a joke about a “taco-shilling Chihuahua,” and the echoes of Langston Hughes in the sentence, “What happens to a decade deferred?” There was only one sticking point: the word senescence.

*****

Before the semester began, the creative writing teacher at the prison—who is also the driving force behind the new college program—had sent my colleague and me an email which read, in part,

You’ll learn quickly how much the men appreciate your efforts.  There are sure to be bumps along the way–the inapt statement, in the conditions, etc.–but these are inevitable, and you have enormous credit with these students.  My experience is that you can make mistakes and they will continue to be grateful. They’ll watch you getting more and more savvy about the facility at the same time that they become better versed in your fields.  It’s quite an exchange for everyone involved.

And, sure enough, right at 8:35 they started to warn me about the bell. I knew the protocol: the students leave the room, while the teacher turns off the lights and exits the prison with the other volunteers. When the bell rang, the class got up and headed out. But I wasn’t ready, thinking that I could exchange comments and pack up my stuff just like I always do after a class. I barely had time to put my sweater on before an officer was eyeing me from the doorway, saying,

Come on. Everyone’s waiting for you.

By the time I turned out the lights in Room 14, the students had joined other groups of men that seemed to come from nowhere, and who were lined up along both walls. After the previous 3 hours of being in class together, they were blending back into the muted green of the general population, and I was just another outsider, passing between them to join up with the rest of the free men and women. I heard a voice say,

“Have a great week, Mr. G., and drive safe.”

I couldn’t make out who it was.

As we retraced our steps down the long hallways, flashing our ID cards at the various guard posts, I glanced out the open windows into a courtyard. The middle of the yard was brightly lit, and empty. Off to the side was a set of weights, half buried under the snow. Then I spotted several dark, hooded shapes—like Milton’s “darkness visible”—huddled up against the walls, and gathering in corners.

Even though I knew that my students were on their way back to the cell blocks, I got the feeling that they must hang out in the yards at times, too, when it’s not a Wednesday or Thursday night, just like all the other inmates who were not motivated enough, not good enough, or not redeemable enough to be in an education program. I wondered about the people who are opposed to such programs, who are not willing to spend a few hundred tax dollars for community college classes to help a handful of people get an education, but think nothing of spending 50 times that much so that they can stand around in cold, dimly lit courtyards. And I realized that it’s not really about the money, at all. As the author of the blog A public defender wrote, in a post called Life Without Possibility of Redemption,

I do not believe that there is anyone who will not change, who will not repent or grow out of their childish bravado. Yet we send scores upon scores of our fellow human beings to these warehouses with no meaningful review of their development and growth for decades and decades.

We cannot be wrong. We are never wrong. We are not them.

Maybe it’s a self-fulfilling prophesy. They cannot change because we don’t let them. Because if we did give them the tools to “better” themselves and they did, our draconian system of punishment would seem barbaric.

It was snowing heavily as I left the prison and climbed, coatless and shivering, into my car. Behind the blank walls, the whole place—buildings, yards, gates, people—seemed to blend together into an abstraction. I wondered where the students were at that moment, and imagined them trying to read and write, while somewhere a guard was saying to someone, “Well, we’re putting you in here,” with a mechanical shrug.  It’s just rhetorical, of course, like the prison itself. Everyone and everything in there exists within The System, moving with the same mechanical shrug—or is it absolution?—through a space more conceptual than physical.

As I drove home through the Stephen King landscape, I remembered a ghost story I once heard, about a shadowy figure that emerges from the walls of a newly constructed house in Maine, and passes through the rooms at odd angles, mindlessly wandering hallways that used to be there, and down which it once walked with real purpose, when it was human.

*****

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

What Community Colleges can Learn from the For-Profits, Part 1

Ever since the U.S. Department of Education introduced its Gainful Employment Regulations for federal student funding, the 3 largest for-profit colleges—Corinthian, University of Phoenix, and Kaplan—have been fighting back hard. And, even though I believe (based on experience) that the arguments of the for-profits are misleading in many ways, they certainly have a few things to teach community colleges.

The favorite meme of the for-profits seems to be that they are serving low-income and minority students who would not ordinarily have access to a college education. These companies, of course, don’t “serve” anyone but their investors, but the point is well taken: they are very good at buying existing urban schools and boosting their enrollment in these areas. What can community colleges learn from this?

Location, location, location!

It may be an old real estate slogan, but location matters, especially when trying to serve a population whose educational opportunities are determined by transportation issues. When I was at Everest, for instance, many of the students took public transportation, and my class times often revolved around the bus schedule.

Out here in the country, if you don’t have a car, you don’t make it to class. Of all the excuses I receive for missed classes, those involving transportation problems usually come from students who live in Buffalo or Rochester.

Monroe Community College is doing an excellent job of enrolling city students. Its main campus, in Brighton, uses shuttle buses, and the school is currently looking for a location in downtown Rochester, close to its Damon City Campus. And Buffalo’s Erie Community College has 5 separate campuses, including 1 in the city.

If community colleges want to appeal to the widest demographic of New Yorkers possible, they need to keep this focus on urban campuses, where a secondary education that won’t put people $50K in debt can be offered close to home.

*****

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

College Comp and the “Big Idea”

Gave my final presentation a couple of days ago for EDF211, “Instructional Design.” Or maybe it should be called, “Backwards Design,” as the main focus was on designing a course by starting with the “Big Idea” and working backwards through SLOs, assessment, and in-class activities. The main benefit of the course has been to give a firm conceptual framework to what I (and probably  everyone else in the class) do intuitively, anyway. But by making the intuitive explicit, and codifying it into a series of design steps, it is making me evaluate my whole approach to teaching ENG101.

Where my old “Big Idea” might have been defined as Help the Students Care, it’s now changing to, Help the Students Talk the Talk. In other words, since they are entering a world of privileged, highly compartmentalized language communities—including the College community as a whole—the students must learn the modes of discourse that such communities value and expect. The implicit definition of good writing as a clear, accurate transcription of thought overlooks this aspect on both the general linguistic level, where written language is shown to be different from both thought and speech, as well as the level of the college curriculum, where each department has been steeped in, and has subsequently absorbed, the rhetorical brew of its own discipline.

Thus, a student could be expected to produce, all in her 1st semester: a History Essay that analyzes the effects of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire on American labor, a Psychology Essay that defines the concept of Closure, and an Expressive Journal for Veterinary Technology, that explores the emotional impact of working with farm animals.

A lot of this Big Idea comes from my own sympathetic reaction to the writings of 1st year students. Those who have recently graduated from high school tend to produce formulaic essays filled with vacuous institutional phraseology like, “In today’s society,” or, “Have you ever thought about X ?” In other words, they’re like the Dr. Seuss story of The Pale Green Pants with Nobody Inside that scared me so much as a kid. On the other hand, international students and those who have had a more adventurous (or even non-existent) public school life often express powerful thoughts and experiences, but do so in a verbal and visual style that seems more, well, creative.

Students on both sides of the Great Essay Divide need practice in producing prose pieces that are both meaningful and polished, i.e., college-level essays.

*****

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Inaugural Post: The Reason I’m Here

There were well over a hundred people who wanted the office I’m sitting in now—experienced professors from other parts of the country, some local adjuncts whom I know personally, and, undoubtedly, several newly minted PhD’s, with more insight and theory than I ever had, or will have. Plus, I keep hearing anecdotal evidence of just how lucky I am. For example, I heard from one professor that an adjunct he knows has built an entire course, from the ground up, and teaches it at many different colleges, and even he wants full time work.

I first thought it was a miracle that landed me here. It certainly felt like one at the time, and still does. (But that’s a future essay.) The reason I was given by the dean is that, having been an adjunct here for several years, she and the search committee all knew, first hand, how I interacted with the students. (In fact, a student stopped in to see me while we were all preparing for the interview, almost like I’d hired him.) The funny thing about this reason is that helping the students was just about the only part of my teaching that wasn’t tainted with the attachment disorder I’d picked up from being a frustrated adjunct for so long. In a way, I guess, the one thing on which I would not compromise proved to be the thing that saved me. Go figure. (Are we back to the miracle again?)

The third—and far more mundane—thing that got me here is the recession, and the big jump in the number of people going to college. Their misfortune has become my opportunity, and if things suddenly start to improve, I’ll be out of a job. But, given my age, I think that my future employment depends less on the rapid turnaround of the American economy than it does on my job performance.

And what does that mean? What is my job? What’s community college for? The short answer is: training future workers. I do have some students whose major is Undecided, and one or two who love learning for its own sake, but mostly they’re here because they sense that they’ll get better jobs, more meaningful careers, than they would find without a degree. And they’re right.

This is also the unspoken mandate of taxpayer-funded education. Why should anyone care that the general population is receiving an education, other than the expectation that people will then be able to give back to society, in tax dollars as well as skill? When someone asks, “Why should my tax dollars go to someone’s else’s schooling?” he’s got a good point, and although I believe that it’s in everyone’s best interest to help ensure an educated citizenry, I can never forget the fact that community colleges are using the public’s money, and that I’m putting some of it into my own bank account.

This will inform everything that I do here—my writing pedagogy, the Attica program, student advisement, everything. I will always, consciously and otherwise, try to infect the students with the excitement and sense of awe that I feel every day of my life, but that’s not why they’re here, nor why I’m here. Apparently, I’m here because the thing I know how to do has suddenly become a hot commodity, since so many other people have lost their jobs. It’s not a social balance I feel comfortable with. I hope I never do.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter