Slaver Quote of the Week

Ray Downs at Vice, in his post, “Who’s Getting Rich off the Prison-Industrial Complex?,” telephoned Henri Wedell, of the Corrections Corporation of America,  to ask if it “bothers him” to think about where his million$ are coming from.

After he stopped laughing, presumably, Wedell said this:

“America is the freest country in the world…America allows more freedom than any other country in the world, much more than Russia and a whole lot more than Scandinavia, where they really aren’t free. So offering all this freedom to society, there’ll be a certain number of people, more in this country than elsewhere, who take advantage of that freedom, abuse it, and end up in prison. That happens because we are so free in this country.”

This kind of self-serving Puritanical bullshit is nothing new—I hear it all the time from people who are opposed to inmate education programs—but it’s still something of a revelation when it comes straight from one of America’s major slave owners.

In case you lost count: Wedell says “free” 6 times.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Prison Program | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A “stellar gauge of earthly show”

The recent media buzz surrounding Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield, whose cover version of Bowie’s “Space Oddity” went viral,  has given new life to a particularly modern psychological phenomenon called “The Overview Effect.”

Coincidentally, my Science Writing class discussed the OE just last week, when we were floating in existential vastness after a unit on cosmology.

What is The Overview Effect? According to Wikipedia,

It refers to the experience of seeing firsthand the reality of the Earth in space, which is immediately understood to be a tiny, fragile ball of life, hanging in the void, shielded and nourished by a paper-thin atmosphere. From space, the astronauts tell us, national boundaries vanish, the conflicts that divide people become less important, and the need to create a planetary society with the united will to protect this “pale blue dot” becomes both obvious and imperative.

This would put the birth of the Effect somewhere in the 1960′s; Frank White, of the Overview Institute, coined the term itself in the 1970′s. There is also a Vimeo video about the Effect, titled, simply, “Overview,” which begins with a quote by the astronomer Fred Hoyle, in 1948: “Once a photograph of the Earth, taken from outside, is available…a new idea as powerful as any in history will be let loose.”

Evidently, Hoyle was half a century too late. This morning I found (while looking for something else) that the Overview Effect predates the space program by several decades, showing up in a Thomas Hardy sonnet, from Poems of the Past and the Present, which was published in 1902:

At a Lunar Eclipse

Thy shadow, Earth, from Pole to Central Sea,
Now steals along upon the Moon’s meek shine
In even monochrome and curving line
Of imperturbable serenity.

How shall I link such sun-cast symmetry
With the torn troubled form I know as thine,
That profile, placid as a brow divine,
With continents of moil and misery?

And can immense Mortality but throw
So small a shade, and Heaven’s high human scheme
Be hemmed within the coasts yon arc implies?

Is such the stellar gauge of earthly show,
Nation at war with nation, brains that teem,
Heroes, and women fairer than the skies?

“Moil,” according to the Online Etymology Dictionary, is the noun version of a verb of the same name, meaning:

“to labour in the mire” [Johnson], c.1400, from Old French moillier “to wet, moisten” (12c., Modern French mouiller), from Vulgar Latin *molliare, from Latin mollis “soft,” from PIE *mel- “soft”…

Hardy’s sonnet reflects this contrast between the seemingly formless fumblings of living on earth, and the sharp, distinct lines of cosmological eternity. In this sense, the “monochrome and curving line” of “yon arc” reminds me of the ethereal rainbow poised above Robert Lowell’s corporeal—and rotting—”“Drunken Fisherman”:

Wallowing in this bloody sty,
I cast for fish that pleased my eye
(Truly Jehovah’s bow suspends
No pots of gold to weight its ends);
Only the blood-mouthed rainbow trout
Rose to my bait. They flopped about
My canvas creel until the moth
Corrupted its unstable cloth.

Meanwhile, Hardy’s “sun-cast symmetry” and “stellar gauge of earthly show” are reminiscent of Satan’s final defeat in George Meredith’s “Lucifer in Starlight”:

Soaring through wider zones that pricked his scars
With memory of the old revolt from Awe,
He reached a middle height, and at the stars,
Which are the brain of heaven, he looked, and sank.
Around the ancient track marched, rank on rank,
The army of unalterable law.

The interesting difference between 1902 and the current form of The Overview Effect, though, is Hardy’s idea of eternal truth being, not observed from without, as astronauts like Hadfield enjoy it, but projected from within. Such is the “sun-cast symmetry” of our own thought being displayed on the face of the universe.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Criticism, In the Classroom | 1 Comment

Prison Ibiza Yet Again

Business Insider’s Robert Johnson responds to the hunger strike at Guantanamo with the same claims that I hear about the prison where I teach. First, the title (all emphasis added): ”THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GITMO STRIKE: Detainees Are Treated Absurdly Well.”

So, let’s see what Robert Johnson considers absurd. Here’s number one:

Yep, it’s food. Then there’s one that hits close to home:

Compliant detainees enjoy a selection of six balanced meals, 25 cable TV channels, classes, and an array of electronic gadgetry and entertainment. I’m talking about a Nintendo DS for every compliant detainee, plus Playstation 3 access with a library full of video games.

What he’s “talking about” is the usual set of sexy electronics that seem to be a particular fetish for those who enjoy browbeating prisoners, welfare queens, and other moral misfits. Actually, I’m amazed he didn’t drag flat screen TV’s into it, as well.

And then the condicio sine qua non of prison clichés:

Resort treatment brings its own means of control for guards, who can threaten to take away handheld game consoles and other privileges from non-compliant detainees.

Ah, yes, the “resort” thing; I’ve heard it a million times before. The only argument missing is the cost. Oh, wait a minute:

Guantanamo is insanely expensive compared to every prison in the world…

Speaking of money, a 20-pack box of Hornady .44/.50-Caliber XTP Sabot Bullets costs $12.99 at Gander Mountain. If one is a fairly good shot—and I’m guessing that most of those who complain about “resort treatment” inside prisons do have that particular skill set—that works out to .65 per prisoner. Permanently. How’s that for savings?

There you have it: a list of just about every story I hear about the Club Med life inside a maximum security prison. (I forgot to mention the “large library,” whatever that means.) At least Johnson has a bit more to go on than the usual complainers: he really visited the place. Actually, it seems to have been more of a guided tour in the company of military handlers, but at least he got to see a soccer ball wrapped in accordion wire, which lets us know how much fun indefinite detainment without trial can be.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Opinion, Politics, Prison Program | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Prepping for the CCCC

I finally completed my agenda for the CCCC Convention. The sessions I chose seem to be more practical than ideological, which was not an easy task, given that many of the 578 sessions have titles like, “A Land without A People: How Composition’s Naturalistic Metaphors Leave the Body Behind,” and, “Disarming the Privileging of ‘Standard’ English: Classroom Implementation of Writing Assignments That Fight Linguistic Dominance.” I almost signed up for that second one, since I agree with the premise, but I wasn’t sure how helpful it would really be in my classes.

Anyway, here’s what I’m going with, roughly grouped by theme:

In-class strategies

  • “Begged? Borrowed? Stolen? None of the Above? Plagiarism as Educational Opportunity”
  • “Critical Thinking and Writing in the First-Year Composition Classroom”
  • “Only Connect: Strategies for Engaging Reluctant, Under-prepared, and Inattentive Writers”
  • “The Content of Writing Courses: Popular Culture Themes to Teach Argumentation”
  • “Science and Writing”

Prison education

  • “Making Lives Behind Bars Visible: Literacy Programs and Activism”
  • “Teaching in Prison: Pedagogy, Research and Literacies”

Digital and on line education

  • “From Homework to Public Work: Locating Digital Communities in the Composition Classroom”
  • “Reporting on Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction (OWI): Six-Year Research Results from the CCCC Committee for Best Practices in OWI”

Assessment and student success

  • Making the Grade: Exploring and Explaining ‘Failure’ in the Composition Classroom and Beyond”

And, finally, I helped myself to a fun dose of political rhetorical analysis:

  • “Media Propaganda in Managed Democracy: Rhetoricians for Peace Special Event”

Here’s part of the description:

Contemporary propaganda is a function of the media culture in which we are enmeshed. When, as Jeffrey Scheuer argues, “democracy and journalistic excellence rise or fall together,” it becomes essential for our democracy that scholars, rhetoricians, teachers, and students continually scrutinize media for its propagandistic tendencies. This Special Event will further this aim in exposing and countering the oversimplification, distortion, exaggeration, and obfuscation of media propaganda.

Now we’re talkin’!

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Nothing Gets Out

Giovanni Battista Piranesi, "Carceri," 1761

The results of the required TB test (negative) that I carry in my folder whenever I go into the prison should be more than enough to remind me of its hermetic environment. A breath of air, exhaled years ago, would still exist, sighing up and down the corridors like a ghost.

The other night, though, I was caught off guard by the actual level of cultural containment that the Great White Wall enjoys.

All semester, I’d been hearing fragments of old lectures coming back to me from the students, like a kind of folklore. They even seemed to anticipate what I was about to say.  Then, last week, we were discussing my essay, Maximum Security English: Opening Night, and one of the students hit me with this:

“I thought you wrote at one point that the prison made you nervous only until you walked into the classroom? I don’t see that part in here. Maybe it was in a previous version of the essay.”

There is no previous version.

As it turns out, he was referencing an article I wrote for the college newspaper back in 2011, and which I never brought into the prison. How did he know about that particular piece of writing? And it wasn’t just him. He made it sound like it was common knowledge in his entire cell block.

Nothing gets out of there. Ever. Not even me, apparently.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Prison Program | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Technical Difficulties

When you have 40,000 students and a single instructor in a MOOC called, “Fundamentals of Online Education: Planning and Application,” you’re pretty much asking for trouble.

According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, an instructor at Georgia Institute of Technology put together a Coursera MOOC, but ran into trouble while trying to herd the proverbial cats.

Ms. Wirth had tried to use Google Docs to help the course’s 40,000 enrolled students to organize themselves into groups. But that method soon became derailed when various authors began editing the documents. Things continued downhill from there; some students also had problems downloading certain course materials that had been added to the syllabus at the last minute. When the confusion continued, Georgia Tech decided to call a timeout.

This is one of the problems with the headlong rush to the digital classroom, especially at this scale. Instead of reasonable discussions of the way on line education can aid in learning and college completion, it’s promoted—marketed?—as nothing less than global access to the world’s knowledge. (“The World,” of course, really means “The West,” but that’s a different story.) Behind the utopian rhetoric is the presupposition that everyone in the world looks something like this:

Not quite. The Chronicle article, in fact, links to a blogger who wrote about her experiences with Georgia Tech’s MOOC, in a post called, “Trying to Watch the First Lecture Videos–Shock!”

I enrolled in an online course about online education that is accessible for people from all over the world, which includes people from areas without highspeed internet access. Yet, when I clicked on the link to watch the first lecture video, my laptop wanted to download a file that was almost 560 MB (!!!). Holy crap, what? My internet access is limited to 3 GB per month before my speed is greatly reduced, and I need my internet connection for daily work.

And even this student seems far more at home digitally than many of my own, some of whom don’t even have computers, much less high speed internet access. Such things, I would imagine, are required before one can learn the skills necessary to join a virtual class of 40,000 and work with Google Docs.

According to The Chronicle, “There is still debate about whether MOOCs can replicate the educational experience of a traditional classroom…” They can’t, and they don’t, except for the fortunate few.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Digital Learning | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Evelyn Underhill’s “Mysticism,” Part One

I was in the college library, looking for a book by Thomas Merton that a friend recommended, the title of which escaped me, and I found instead a huge, light blue volume called Mysticism: A Study in the Nature and Development of Man’s Spiritual Consciousness, by someone named Evelyn Underhill. I flipped it open to page 91, and saw this:

More than the apprehension of God, then, more than the passion for the Absolute, is needed to make a mystic. These must be combined with an appropriate psychological make-up, with a nature capable of extraordinary concentration, an exalted moral emotion, a nervous organization of the artistic type.

That sounded like a good diagnosis. I’ve experienced a few “mystical” moments, myself. Nothing extravagant, only occasional and fleeting revelations of a beingness that appears to exist outside language, and hence beyond the pale of every day consciousness. Believe me, it’s a thrilling experience. So, even though Mysticism is huge, and even though I’m already enjoying Richard Holmes’ The Age of Wonder: The Romantic Generation and the Discovery of the Beauty and Terror of Science, I took the book home.

I believed I had stumbled upon some obscure, out-of-print author from 100 years ago. Turns out, I was wrong: Google auto-filled “Evelyn Underhill” almost immediately. According to Wikipedia, she was born in 1875, and was “an English Anglo-Catholic writer and pacifist known for her numerous works on religion and spiritual practice, in particular Christian mysticism.” And, far from being an unknown title, “No other book of its type—until the appearance in 1946 of Aldous Huxley’s The Perennial Philosophy—met with success to match that of her best-known work, Mysticism, published in 1911.” Oops. Well, at least my intuition of the time frame was correct.

The little bit of research I’ve done on Underhill shows we have more in common than just that quote from page 91. Apparently, she had some sort of intense mystical experience rather early on, although I haven’t been able to find out what it was. But here’s a passage from her Practical Mysticism, as quoted at pbs.org:

Has it never happened to you to lose yourself for a moment in a swift and satisfying experience for which you found no name? When the world took on a strangeness, and you rushed out to meet it, in a mood at once exultant and ashamed? Was there not an instant when you took the lady who now orders your dinner into your arms, and she suddenly interpreted to you the whole of the universe? a universe so great, charged with so terrible an intensity, that you have hardly dared to think of it since. Do you remember that horrid moment at the concert, when you became wholly unaware of your comfortable seven-and-sixpenny seat? Those were onsets of involuntary contemplation; sudden partings of the conceptual veil. Dare you call them the least significant moments of your life? Did you not then, like the African saint, “thrill with love and dread,” though you were not provided with a label for that which you adored?

I’m not sure who the dinner lady is, but the rest of the passage is perfect, especially the use of words like “terrible” and “dread.” And here’s another example, this one from a paper on Underhill, called, “Beyond the Fringe of Speech,” by Marie Therese Crowley, of Australian Catholic University:

During that visit to Italy, and in particular to Florence, she encountered the world of Renaissance art, ancient churches and the expressiveness of Italian Catholicism. Such an exposure would be highly significant in her life. Underhill wrote of Florence: “this place has taught me more than I can tell you; it’s a sort of gradual unconsciousness growing into an understanding of things.”

I have always considered my short visit to Florence (how many decades ago now?) as a “highly significant” dividing point in my own life. In fact, I like to say that it almost made me a Catholic!

Anyway, the book is terrific, so far. (I’m only on page 20.) Underhill clearly knew her stuff, philosophically speaking, and her writing is balanced and poetic. According to Wikipedia, Mysticism is “distinguished by the very qualities which make it inappropriate as a straightforward textbook. The spirit of the book is romantic, engaged, and theoretical rather than historical or scientific.” It’s not easy to find brief quotes that will survive being ripped from their beds; this one might do for now:

But what the external reality is which evoked the image that I call “house,” I do not know and never can know. It is as mysterious, as far beyond my apprehension, as the constitution of the angelic choirs. Consciousness shrinks in terror from contact with the verb “to be.”

Which is just about the best definition of “the sublime” I’ve ever seen. The quote sounds a great deal like Huxley, in The Doors of Perception, reeling back from the edge of the abyss. It’s also reminiscent of Martin Buber’s I and Thou, Gaston Bachelard’s Poetics of Space (one of my personal favorites), and Kenneth Burke’s Language as Symbolic Action. And let’s not forget the Burning Bush!

More on Mysticism later…

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 39 Comments

An Open Letter to Shane Glenn of Stratasys

Dear Mr. Glenn:

I’ve always liked the idea of 3-D printers. How cool is it to allow people to actually embody their thoughts? Kind of like the gadget on Star Trek that lets Picard say, “Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.” Or like Wonkavision. I also noticed that your web site features wonderful applications for your printers, like the new set of arms for the little girl, Emma.

Recently, though, I read in my local paper that your company is a bit…well…surprised about its technology being used to create AR-15′s. (Wasn’t it the late Gil Scott-Heron who wrote, “America leads the world in being shocked”?) Anyway, here’s what the article says:

Shane Glenn, director of investor relations, said gun-making was never something envisioned for the machines. “The gun issue is something that the 3-D printing industry will have to address going forward,” Glenn said.

And I thought I was a starry-eyed optimist! Think about what country Stratasys does business in. How could it not realize that it would be hijacked by sociopaths? Did you not expect that there would be people like Texas law student Cody Wilson out there? Wilson, leader of the Wiki Weapons Project, wants Americans to be able to print off a weapon whenever we feel scared, which, for some of us, apparently, is always. He seems to have heard of the Sandy Hook Massacre, but, he says, “by affording the Second Amendment protection, we understand events like these will happen.” (This may seem rather cold-blooded, but consider the source.)

The Huffington Post has reported that, even though Stratasys refuses to do business with Wilson, he’s trying to raise money to buy a 3-D printer from somewhere else. Anywhere else, probably. And he’ll probably get one, despite Stratasys’ best efforts. The printers are expensive, but if $20,000 and the slaughter of other people’s children are necessary to let his violent paranoia take actual form, then that’s just a price he’s willing to pay.

Wayne LaPierre said it best, at last week’s press conference for the NRA:

“The truth is that our society is populated by an unknown number of genuine monsters—people so deranged, so evil, so possessed by voices and driven by demons that no sane person can possibly ever comprehend them. They walk among us every day.”

Do they ever. Of course, I don’t think LaPierre was referring to “genuine monsters” like Cody Wilson—or himself, for that matter—but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Your truly, etc. etc.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Opinion, Politics | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

No Surprise, Really

A few weeks ago, a policy brief, titled Three Myths about Copyright Law and Where to Start to Fix It, made some headlines because it was written by a staffer for the Republican Study Committee. At the time, I found it refreshing to see a Republican actually argue for something on the ground that usually gets only airy adoration, a.k.a. ‘lip service.’ The web site ars technica called the brief “shockingly sensible.”

But long it could not be. Almost immediately, the brief was covered in so many red “REDACTED” stamps that it looked like someone, panic stricken, had been trying to drive a stake through a vampire. And now, not surprisingly, the poor, honest, wretch who wrote the thing—Derek Khanna—has been pulled from his melodious lay to muddy death. In plain English, he was shit-canned by the Republican Study Committee.

Could have seen that one that coming a mile away.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Opinion, Politics | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Makers vs. Takers, Kickin’ It Old School

The trope of the Makers vs. the Takers, which is the same as that of the Welfare Queen etc., feels like it’s been around forever. In fact, I often hear that it goes all the way back to Ronald Reagan. But it actually goes back farther than that—much farther.

I just stumbled across a paper called, Notes on the Capabilities of the Negro for Civilization, delivered to the Anthropological Society of London in 1864, by someone named Henry F. J. Guppy. It’s about as perfect an example of 19th Century White Supremacy as one can find. Here are a couple of money quotes:

The negroes generally have a tendency to withdraw themselves from the neighbourhood of their fellow colonists [in England], and to bury themselves in the valleys and woods, there to live a merely animal life…This conduct is probably attributed to their natural and uneradicated desire for ease, and dislike for labour of any kind..

*snip*

The negro, in effect, requires constant stimulation, and the hard teaching of necessity to force him to activity. He has no ambition of rising either in intelligence or in wealth. When left to himself but for a short time, he falls back rapidly into a mere listless condition, in which he cares not for the outer world, or, indeed, for anything out of his own personal existence.

And then, of course, he votes for Barack Obama.

These are the very words of the Mitt Romney supporters after the last election. It was easy enough to sense what was wrong with them at the time, but I had no idea how deep into the pit this rhetoric actually goes.

By the way, according to the notes of the meeting, here is a response from another member of the Society:

Mr. Pusey rose to explain that he considered himself opposed to the opinions expressed in the paper. The freed negro did not work because he was not adequately and steadily paid for his labor.

HUZZAH for Pusey! Obviously a union thug.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Posted in Opinion, Politics | 2 Comments